Hopefully they find someone hot from three to bring out Washington's Bigs. We will see.
LL 18%, the shots that were falling against N Arizona aren't yet
They are getting some good looks. Keep getting those, some will start falling. Good agression on O,
Need to be a bit more aware on D, two people goinf wirg rge same player, leaving Dyke open
You wouldn't think a depleted Lady Lobos are going to be able to get too far behind.
Not a good first quarter.
Gotta get our shots to start falling.
Gotta find a way to drive to the basket and kick out to V for a 3.
Brown has hit two threes for us.😊
Lobos 2 for 12 on 3s, so WA lets us shoot.
Weird 1st half, with their size I expected Huskies to ground and pound. But so far they are content to get into a 3pt shooting contest with Lady Lobos.
Effort good both quarters. shooing warmed up and go ahead. Keep it up ladies.
11 for Viane, 4 rebounds for Paula
Effort good both quarters. shooing warmed up and go ahead. Keep it up ladies.
11 for Viane, 4 rebounds for Paula
-------
Shooing??? 😉
18% first Q
53% second Q
@string-music If they don't S&M, Lady Lobos might be going to the 3rd round!
Too early to be thinking that....
Good effort on the boards, and better shot selection. Keep it up Lobos!
Aniyah needs to settle down. Patience. Get the ball to Paula.
...and here we go.😞
Water reservoir!
Bradbury "we ran out of gas"
Lady Lobos got killed on the boards. Outrebounded 41-26…
For some reason Bradbury either couldn't or wouldn't bring in some fresh horses in the 4th
Ran out of gas in the 4th quarter with the starting 5 playing 33 to 40 minutes. I'll remember this team for the way they played in their final game in the PIT vs NAU. Good night fans, and thank you Lobos for an entertaining season.
Bradbury "we ran out of gas"
I guess it is easier for Bradbury to blame the players for their “running out of gas” than admit that his philosophy of playing undersized players placed them at a huge disadvantage against Washington which started three players that were 6’4” or better.
Lady Lobos got killed on the boards. Outrebounded 41-26…
I wasn't able to tune into the game until 8 minutes to go in the 4th. We had a 7 point lead with 8 to go and I'm thinking, can we pull this off? However, as soon as I pulled up the stat sheet and it showed the starters playing "heavy" minutes, I was afraid this would go the way of many, many Bradbury games, where the starters are ridden into the ground, which results in porous 4th quarter defense and then shots stop falling with dead legs.
I think the announcers said we go outscored 26-8 in the 4th quarter.
Without seeing the game, it appeared Nia provided some positive minutes (7) 2-3 shooting, 1-1 from 3, so why didn't Bradbury play her more so he wouldn't have to run the starters into the ground? Hulda as well, 1-2 FTs in 2 minutes.
Bradbury "we ran out of gas"
I guess it is easier for Bradbury to blame the players for their “running out of gas” than admit that his philosophy of playing undersized players placed them at a huge disadvantage against Washington which started three players that were 6’4” or better.
We can't play post players that we don't have, and that goes back to not recruiting any post players. However, I agree, it's a philosophical issue that was on display again tonight, that doesn't mesh with winning basketball games in March, where physical interior play, fundamentals and deep benches rule the day.
It he wanted to blame the players, he would have said "they" not "we". And he didn't name the player who kept getting beat on defense in the 4th quarter. Quite frankly, running out of gas was not a problem this year like it was in previous years. Tonight was the first night I saw a tired team.Bradbury "we ran out of gas"
I guess it is easier for Bradbury to blame the players for their “running out of gas” than admit that his philosophy of playing undersized players placed them at a huge disadvantage against Washington which started three players that were 6’4” or better.